• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Whiplash & Whiplash Injury St. Louis

Whiplash & Whiplash Injury St. Louis

  • Whiplash
    • What is Whiplash?
    • How Long Does Whiplash Last?
  • Symptoms
  • Treatment
    • Exercises
    • Physiotherapy
    • Surgery
  • Compensation
  • Car Accident
    • What to Do When You Get in a Car Accident
    • The Most Common Causes of Car Accidents
    • Wrong Way Car Crash
    • Why Hire a St. Louis Car Accident Lawyer?
    • Injuries
      • Brain Injury
      • Delayed Injuries
      • Head Injury
      • Leg Injury
    • T-Bone Accident
    • Uninsured Motorist
    • Who Pays My Medical Bills?
  • Whiplash St. Louis Blog

FAQs About Circumstantial Evidence in an Auto Accident Case

June 14, 2022 by Christopher

Circumstantial evidence generally refers to evidence that doesn’t directly prove the truth of an assertion but allows for an inference of its truth.

If you have been injured in a car accident, you may be wondering what type of evidence is needed to win your case. In general, there are two types of evidence: direct and circumstantial. Direct evidence is pretty self-explanatory; it’s evidence that directly proves that the defendant was responsible for the accident. Circumstantial evidence, on the other hand, is not as straightforward. This article will answer five frequently asked questions about circumstantial evidence.

FREE CONSULTATION (314) 361-4242

lawyer considering indirect evidence

What Is Circumstantial Evidence?

Circumstantial evidence refers to evidence that doesn’t directly prove the truth of an assertion but allows for an inference of its truth. In an auto accident lawsuit, this type of evidence can be used to prove liability. For example, if the defendant was speeding at the time of the crash, that fact may be used to infer that the defendant was negligent. Similarly, if the plaintiff was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the accident, that fact could possibly be used to infer that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent.

However, it’s important to keep in mind that circumstantial evidence is not always conclusive. For this reason, it’s often best to combine circumstantial evidence with other types of evidence, such as eyewitness testimony or expert opinion.

How Does Circumstantial Evidence Differ From Direct Evidence?

Direct evidence is typically defined as firsthand testimony or physical evidence that directly proves a particular fact. In other words, it directly proves that the defendant was responsible for the accident. Circumstantial evidence is not as straightforward; it supports the conclusion that the defendant was responsible for the accident, but generally does not prove it directly.

How Is Circumstantial Evidence Different From Hearsay?

Hearsay can be defined as “a statement made by a witness who did not see or hear the event in question”. In other words, it’s second-hand information. Circumstantial evidence is not second-hand information; it’s evidence that supports a conclusion indirectly.

What Are the Benefits of Using Circumstantial Evidence?

There are many benefits of using circumstantial evidence. Some of the most common benefits include:

  • It can be used to support a conclusion when there is no direct evidence available
  • It can be used to corroborate direct evidence
  • It can be used to fill in the gaps when the direct evidence is incomplete

What Are the Drawbacks of Using Circumstantial Evidence?

One of the major drawbacks of circumstantial evidence is that it’s often open to interpretation. What one person may see as a clear indication of fault, another may see as simply an unfortunate coincidence. This can make it difficult for jurors to reach a unanimous verdict and lead to lengthy and expensive court battles.

Another drawback of circumstantial evidence is that it can be easily manipulated, further complicating matters.

Another disadvantage of relying on circumstantial evidence is that it can give the impression that the plaintiff does not have a strong case. If the jury feels that the plaintiff is trying to hide behind technicalities, they may be less likely to award damages.

There you have it – a brief overview of circumstantial evidence in car accident lawsuits. While this type of evidence can be useful, it’s important to consider its limitations. If you have been involved in a car accident, it’s best to speak with an experienced auto injury attorney who can help you navigate the legal process, collect strong evidence and build a solid case.

St. Louis Auto Accident Lawyer

If you have been involved in an auto accident and are looking for an experienced St. Louis car accident attorney, contact The Hoffman Law Firm today. Our team has over 20 years of experience and is ready to help St. Louis car accident victims get the compensation they deserve. Contact us today for a free consultation.

FREE Consultation

Speak with an experienced attorney 24/7

Click to Call: (314) 361-4242

Related Posts:

  • St. Louis Car Accident Attorney
    St. Louis Car Accident Attorney
  • When to Get a Lawyer in a St. Louis Car Accident
    When to Get a Lawyer in a St. Louis Car Accident
  • Car Accident Court Hearing
    Car Accident Court Hearing
  • Pre Existing Injury Aggravated in Car Accident
    Pre Existing Injury Aggravated in Car Accident
  • How to Obtain Compensation for a Soft Tissue Injury
    How to Obtain Compensation for a Soft Tissue Injury
  • When Is It Too Late to Hire a St. Louis Car Accident Attorney?
    When Is It Too Late to Hire a St. Louis Car Accident…

Filed Under: Whiplash St. Louis Blog Tagged With: evidence

Footer

The Hoffmann Law Firm, L.L.C.
130 S Bemiston Ave # 603
St. Louis, MO 63105
(314) 361-4242

Free Consultation Request

    RSS St. Louis Car Accident Attorney – Car Accident Lawyer St. Louis

    • 5 Common Types of Accidents Caused By Drunk Drivers
    • Daylight Savings Time Car Accidents – St. Louis Accident Lawyer
    • The 5 Steps of the Mediation Process for a St. Louis Car Accident
    • Step to Appeal a Denied St. Louis Car Accident Claim
    • 4 Unique Driver Distractions St. Louis Uber and Lyft Drivers Face
    • 5 Tips to Prevent Texting and Driving Car Accidents in St. Louis
    • Soft Tissue Injuries From St. Louis Car Accident – Common Misconceptions
    • Foot and Ankle Pain From a St. Louis Car Accident
    • Spinal Cord Injury Pain After a St. Louis Car Accident
    • Injured in an Uber or Lyft Accident in St. Louis? Know Your Options for Compensation

    Copyright © 2023 The Hoffmann Law Firm L.L.C.
    The images included on this site are not actual attorneys, events, or clients. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Attorney Chris Hoffmann handles car and truck accident claims throughout Eastern Missouri and Western Illinois. He represents injured clients in St. Louis, St. Charles, St. Peters, Clayton, East St. Louis, Alton, Hillsboro and Belleville, and other cities in St. Louis County, St. Charles County, and Jefferson Country, MO, and St. Clair County and Madison County, IL.